Study on γ-ray source from the resonant reaction 19F(p,αγ) 16O atEp = 340 keV
Liu Fu-Long1, 2, 3, Yang Wan-Sha1, 2, 3, Wei Ji-Hong1, 2, 3, Wu Di2, He Yang-Fan2, Li Yu-Chen2, Ma Tian-Li2, Shen Yang-Ping2, Fan Qi-Wen2, He Chuang-Ye2, †, Guo Bing2, ‡, Wang Nai-Yan1, 2, 3, §
Key Laboratory of Radiation Beam Technology and Materials Modification of the Ministry of Education, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China
Beijing Radiation Center, Beijing 100875, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: hechuangye@126.com guobing@ciae.ac.cn wangny@bnu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0400502), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11975316 and 11655003), and the Continuous Basic Research Project of China (Grant No. WDJC-2019-02).

Abstract

High energy γ-ray can be used in many fields, such as nuclear resonant fluorescence, nuclear medicine imaging. One of the methods to generate high-energy γ-ray is nuclear resonant reaction. The 19F (p,αγ) 16O reaction was used to generate 6.13-MeV γ-ray in this work. The angular distribution of 6.13-MeV γ-ray was measured by six LaBr3 detectors. The thick-target yield curve of 6.13-MeV γ-ray had been measured. The maximum yield was determined to be (1.85 ± 0.01) × 10−8 γ/proton, which was measured by HPGe detector and LaBr3 detector. The absolute efficiency of all the detectors was calibrated using 60 Co and 27Al (p,γ) 28Si reaction at Ep = 992 keV. The cross section and total resonant width of the reaction were determined to be 95.1±1.0 mb (1 b = 10−24 cm2) and ΓCM = 2.21±0.22 keV, respectively.

1. Introduction

High energy γ-ray can be used in many important applications from γ radiography to nuclear materials detection.[13] Lots of applications are strongly related to photonuclear reactions. The cross section of photonuclear reactions reaches its maximum in giant dipole resonance (GDR) energy range.[4] Therefore, γ-rays in a high energy range of 5 MeV–30 MeV have important significance in many aspects. Here we will mainly introduce the applications on nuclear reactor design[5] and nuclear astrophysics.[68] In nuclear reactor design, accurate cross sections of photonuclear reactions are needed in many areas as photonuclear reaction plays a non-negligible role in nuclear reactors, such as reactor in-core dosimetry, radiation damage estimates in reactor structural materials, safeguards, and fast reactor calculations, etc. In nuclear astrophysics, one of the unanswered questions is to determine how the heavy elements were synthesized during the evolution of universe.[9] It is widely accepted that the bulk of the nuclei heavier than iron has been synthesized by neutron capture in the astrophysical r- and s-processes. Those neutron-capture processes cannot account for the synthesis of some of the heavy (A ≥ 100) neutron-deficient nuclei. These nuclei are shielded from the chain of β decays by other stable isobars. The production mechanism for these so-called p-nuclei[10] is photodisintegration in the astrophysical γ process by successive(γ, n), (γ, p), and (γ, α) reactions.

The difficulty among these studies discussed above is that photonuclear cross-section data are scarce in GDR energy range,[11,12] and especially there is a lack of data in some important cases. So a bright γ-ray source should be established for studying photonuclear cross-section data. The (p, γ) resonance is a good way to produce high energy monoenergetic γ-ray. There are several different reactions to be chosen to produce high energy γ-ray ranging from 6 MeV to 20 MeV. The energy range just fits in the GDR region. In this work, the 6.13-MeV γ-ray can be generated from the 19F (p, αγ)16O reaction. Also, the19F (p, αγ)16O reaction plays a crucial role for the net CNO mass fraction in nuclear astrophysics.[13] In addition, particle-induced γ-ray emission (PIGE) is a common technique used to detect and analyze elements lighter than calcium.[14] 19F (p, αγ)16O reaction can help to study the concentration of fluorine in dentistry.[15,16] There are a variety of fundamental and applied reasons for studying this reaction.[17] Precise measurements of γ yield must be carried out before these applications are studied using the high-energy γ ray produced by the 19F (p, αγ)16O reaction. According to the Breit–Wingner formula, the cross section and the width of the resonance are the key parameters of the resonance reaction.[18,19]

The measurement for the resonance parameters of the 19F(p, αγ)16O reaction at Ep = 340 keV have been studied by several investigators. They have measured the resonant energy, maximum cross section, and the width of the total reaction, etc. In 1941, Strein measured the thick-target by using the electroscope.[20] In 1948, Bonner performed a new measurement, and obtained the new cross section and total resonance width of the reaction with GM counter.[21] With the development of detectors, Keszthelyi,[22] Dieumegrad,[23] Becker,[24] Uhrmacher,[25] Crof,[26] Spyrou,[27] and Couture[28] performed new experiments for the resonance parameters. But the parameters of resonance they had gotten were different from each other, and few people had measured the angular distribution of 6.13-MeV gamma ray’s yield. The angular distribution of 6.13-MeV gamma ray’s yield has been reported by Von Th Retz-Schmidt and Croft, respectively.[26,29] However, the results are vary widely from each other. There were no sufficient data to support the accuracy of yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray in previous measurements. It is highly desirable to have a new measurement of the thick target yield with new detectors.

In the present study, we aim at getting the precise thick-target yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray using the most advanced detectors up to now. First, the absolute efficiencies of HPGe and LaBr3 detectors in energy range of 1.17 MeV–10.70 MeV was calibrated. Then the angular distribution of 6.13-MeV γ ray’s yield had been measured, and the thick-target yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray has been calculated. The flux of γ source from the resonant reaction 19F (p, αγ)16O at Ep = 340 keV was determined finally. The new reference values of the total width of resonance and the maximum cross section were gained.

2. Experiment

The experiment was performed at the 2×1.7-MeV tandem accelerator in China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE). In this experiment, the current of proton beam was about 6 μA. In order to ensure the yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray only from the resonant reaction at Ep = 340 keV, the proton beam was accelerated to the energies from 322 keV to 434 keV with a beam-spot of 4 mm, and the beam bombarded onto the natural LiF target. The thickness of target is 180 μ g/cm2. The target was evaporated on an air-cooled Ta disk which is 300-μm thickness with a diameter of 19.5 mm. As a vacuum barrier, the Ta disk placed at the end of the beam pipe. The beam pipe is 400-mm long and with an inner diameter of 18 mm. The beam pipe was electrically isolated from the the pipe in the upstream. So we used the beam pipe for recording the quantity of protons. The escape probability for secondary electrons is approximately 0.013% by assuming an isotropic emission. Wilson[30] and Criswell, et al.[31] had proven that the secondary electron emission has smaller cross sections at most backward angles. Therefore, the charge collection was reliable. A pure Ta disk of 300 μm in thickness was used to evaluate the in-beam background.

One coaxial HPGe detector and six LaBr3 detectors of ϕ3× 4 inch (1 inch = 2.54 cm) were used for detecting the γ-ray. In the experiment, the HPGe detector was placed at 14.5-cm distance from the target position at 72° in the direction of proton beam. In order to get the yield of full space, the LaBr3 detectors were used to detect the γ-ray angular distribution from 0° to 165°. We used six LaBr3 detectors placed at 50-cm distance from the target position at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150° to the beam axis, respectively. The experiment data of 15°, 45°, 75°, 105°, 135°, and 165° had been obtained by increasing 15° of each LaBr3 detector’s direction. The HPGe detector was used as a monitor of the yield at the same time. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Layout of experimental setup. The target is at the end of the beam pipe. LaBr3 detectors were used for measuring the angular distribution of γ-ray’s yield.

In 19F(p, αγ)16O resonance reaction, the energy of γ-ray we concerned is 6.13 MeV, so we should calibrate the efficiency of HPGe and LaBr3 detectors at this energy. However, the maximum energy of γ-ray from γ-ray sources is only about 3.5 MeV. The common method for calibrating the efficiency in high energy range is using the γ-ray from (p, γ) and (n, γ) reactions. The γ-ray form 1.77 MeV to 10.76 MeV could be generated from the 27Al (p, γ) 28Si reaction at Ep = 992 keV which usually as a standard reaction for efficiency calibration.[32] So we used 60Co and 27Al (p, γ) 28Si reaction at Ep = 992 keV for calibrating the efficiency of all the detectors. The solid angle keeps the same during the calibration and bombarding the target. The energy calibration of detectors has been performed with 1.46-MeV γ-ray and 2.16-MeV γ-ray of natural radioactive nuclide, 40K and 208Bi.

We calibrated the absolute full-peak efficiencies at 1.17 MeV and 1.33 MeV using 60Co and the absolute full-peak efficiencies in an energy range of 1.77 MeV–10.76 MeV using 27Al(p,γ) 28Si reaction. Finally, we obtained the absolute full-peak efficiencies from an energy range of 1.17 MeV–10.76 MeV. For a better fit, the absolute full-peak efficiency was determined by the full-peak efficiencies curve with the least-squares fit. Figure 2 shows the efficiency curve of HPGe and LaBr3 detector at 0°.

Fig. 2. Absolute full-energy-peak detecting efficiency of HPGe detector and LaBr3 detector at 0°. The squares are experimental data of HPGe, the red line is the power-law fit to the experimental data, the circles are experimental data of LaBr3 detector at 0°, the blue line is the power-law fit to the experimental data.

Finally, we determined the absolute efficiency of 6.13-MeV γ-ray for HPGe is ε = 1.44× 10−4, and the absolute efficiency of 6.13-MeV γ-ray for LaBr3 at 0° is ε = 1.45× 10−4. These data were used for calculating the yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray.

3. Data analysis

The spectrum of γ-ray measured by HPGe detector and LaBr3 detector at 75° is shown in Fig. 3. There are several γ-ray lines in the spectrum and the intensity of 6.13-MeV γ-ray is the largest in the spectrum detected by HPGe and LaBr3 detectors. In Fig. 3(a), the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the 6.13-MeV full energy peak is 8.09 keV. In Fig. 3(c), the energy resolution of the 6.13-MeV full energy peak is 1.1%.

Fig. 3. Spectrum of γ-rays from the 19F(p,αγ)16O: panels (a) and (b) came from HPGe detector; panels (c) and (d) came from LaBr3 detector. S6129 and D6129 represent the single escape peak and the double escape peak of 6129-keV γ-ray, respectively.

As we can see in Figs. 3(b) and 3(d), 6.13 MeV is not the maximum energy in the spectrum, the double escape peak of 7.12 MeV overlaps with the full energy peak of 6.13 MeV due to the energy resolution and the volume of the detector. The count of the double escape peak of 6.13 MeV is roughly the same as that of its total energy peak from the energy spectrum. Hence, we can approximately assume that the total energy peak count of 7.12 MeV is equal to its double escape peak count. The intensity of 6.13-MeV γ-ray would increase by 0.98% as a result of double escape of 7.12-MeV γ-ray. There should not be background from the disturbance except high energy cosmic rays and the double escape peak of 7.12 MeV. In the background spectrum, we did not find other high energy peak than 7.12 MeV. The cosmic background count rates had been discussed in the previous work.[19]

To determine the 19F(p,αγ)16O reaction cross sections, it is necessary to obtain the absolute number of produced compound nuclei Ncomp. An excited compound nucleus always decays to the ground state. So the Ncomp is equal to the total counts 6.13-MeV γ-ray of 4π. We use Y as the thick-target yield of 4π.

The measurement of the angular distribution is necessary for calculating the yield in full space.[26,29] The γ-ray angular distribution of emission probability is related to the initial and final spin angular momenta of the de-excitation. The relative intensity data were measured with LaBr3 detectors and fitted by Legendre function which could be expressed to W(θ) = A0 + A2P2cos(θ) + A4P4cos(θ). The angular distribution of 6.13-MeV gamma ray is shown in Fig. 4. The coefficients were determined to be A2/A0 = –0.0821±0.0053, A4/A0 = –0.0203±0.0061.

Fig. 4. Angular distribution for 6.13-MeV γ-ray from 19F(p, αγ)16O. The squares are the experimental data using LaBr3 detector. The line is the fitting curve following W(θ) = A0 + A2P2cos(θ) + A4P4cos(θ).

The formula of thick-target yield can be written as

where Y(θ) is the yield in unit solid angle at a certain angle θ. Y(θ) = Y(θ0)W(θ)/4π W(θ0), θ0 is degree where the detector was established,

where Nγ is the count of γ-ray of 6.13 MeV measured with detector, Np is the number of protons which irradiated on LiF target during the measurement, and ε is the absolute efficiency of the detector. Since dΩ = sin(θ)dθ d φ, equation (1) can be written as follows:

The calculation of cross section can be written as

where σr is the maximum cross section of the reaction. ε1 is the energy loss of a single molecule of LiF.[33] Γ is the total width of resonance after correction. Ymax is the maximum yield of the reaction which can be obtained from Eq. (3).

The width of the resonance can be correction as

where Γ′ is the width of the resonance which can be obtained from Fig. 5. Δ Ea is the energy dispersion of the accelerator.

Fig. 5. Yield curve for 6.13-MeV γ-ray from 19F(p, αγ)16O. The blue circles are experiment data of the LaBr3 detector at 0°, and the red triangles are experiment data of the HPGe detector.
4. Results and discussion

We measured the thick target yield curve of 6.13-MeV γ-ray from 19F(p, αγ)16O reaction with beam energy of 322 keV–434 keV, as shown in Fig. 5. There is a plateau from 350 keV to 362 keV, which corresponds to the max thick target yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray measured from the detector.

Finally, we determined the thick-target yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray from the resonant reaction 19F (p, αγ)16O at Ep = 340 keV is (1.85±0.01)× 10−8 γ/proton. The total resonance width of the reaction was determined by the absolute value of the energy difference corresponds to 25%–75% of the maximum yield in the thick target yield curve. An apparent resonance width of 2.7 keV is deduced from Fig. 5. After correction for the beam energy dispersion and transformation to the centre-mass reaction frame a resonance width parameter, ΓCM = 2.21±0.22 keV was obtained. The maximum cross section was also determined by the thick-target yield and the resonance width. The value of maximum cross section is 95.1±1.0 mb.

Precise measurements of 6.13-MeV γ-ray have been made by our laboratory. Some key parameters havee been provided. The experimental parameters measured in the present work are also compared with the previous experimental data. And the specific details were shown in Table 1. As we can see from Table 1, the values of the thick-target yield and the resonance obtained by the former researchers were different from each other. As mentioned above, in 1940s, Bonner, et al. used the Geiger–Muller counter to detect the γ-ray, so it could not distinguish the 6.13-MeV γ-ray from other energies of the γ-ray. So the error of 6.13-MeV γ-ray’s yield is relatively large. The value of Croft’s results might also be not accurate enough because of the angular distribution. The angular distribution of the present work is different from that of Croft’s result. Yet the trend is the same as it was shown by Retz-Schmidt[29] which is symmetric about 90°. In this work, we used the up-to-date detectors including LaBr3 and HPGe to gain the precise thick target yield of the 6.13-MeV γ-ray by accurate efficiency calibration and measurement of the angular distribution. Some new reference values of the total width of the resonance and the maximum cross section have been achieved in our experimental studies.

Table 1.

Measured resonance parameters compared with others.

.
5. Conclusion

High energy γ-ray is useful in many fields. The yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray from 19F(p, αγ)16O reaction was reported diverse from each experiment. For exploring the high energy γ-ray from resonant reaction, we performed a new measurement for confirming 6.13-MeV γ-ray’s thick target yield of 19F(p, αγ)16O reaction. The detector we used in our experiment is a high resolution coaxial HPGe detector and high resolution LaBr3 detectors. Besides, in order to calculate the yield of 6.13-MeV γ-ray at 4π, the angular distribution has been determined. We determined the 6.13-MeV γ-ray’s flux from 19 F(p, αγ)16O to be (1.85±0.01)× 10−8γ/proton. The width of the resonance and the maximum cross section were obtained from the present research.

Reference
[1] Smith D L Ikeda Y Uno Y 1996 Fus. Eng. Des. 31 41
[2] Smith D L Maekawa F Ikeda Y 2000 Fus. Eng. Des. 47 403
[3] Micklich B J et al. 2000 Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Appl. Accel. Res. Ind. November, 2000 AIP576 Denton, TX 1 5
[4] Danos m Fuller E G 1965 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 15 29
[5] IAEA 2000 Handbook on Photonuclear Data for Applications: Cross-Sections and Spectra International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna IAEA Report No. 1178
[6] Cyburt R H Fields B D Olive K A et al. 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 015004
[7] Arnould M Takahashi K 1999 Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 395
[8] Woosley S E Howard W M 1978 Astrophys. J. Suppl. 36 285
[9] Haseltine E 2002 Discover 23 37
[10] Arnould M Goriely S 2003 Phys. Rep. 384 1
[11] Hara K Y Harada H Kitatani F et al. 2007 J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 44 938
[12] Kitatani F Harada H Goko S et al. 2010 J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 47 367
[13] Wiescher M Gorres J Schatz H 1999 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 25 R133
[14] Mateus R Jesusbc A P Fonsecabc M Luís H Ribeiroac J P 2007 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 264 340
[15] Okuyama K Komatsu H Yamamoto H Pereira P P N R Bedran-Russo A K Nomachi M Sato T Sano H 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 269 2269
[16] Komatsua H Yamamoto H Matsuda M Kijimura T Kinugawa M Okuyama K Nomachic M Yasuda K Satoh T Oikawa S 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 269 2274
[17] Ajzenberg-Selove F 1987 Nucl. Phys. 475 1
[18] Bethe H A Placzek G 1937 Phys. Rev. 51 450
[19] Dang Y L Liu F L Fu G Y Wu D He C Y Guo B Wang N Y 2019 Chin. Phys. 28 131
[20] Streib J F Fowler W A Lauritsen C C 1941 Phys. Rev. 59 253
[21] Bonner T W Evans J E 1948 Phys. Rev. 73 666
[22] Keszthelyi L Berkes I Demeter I Fodor I 1962 Nucl. Phys. 29 241
[23] Dieumegrad D Maurel B Amsel G 1980 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 168 93
[24] Becker H W Kieser W E Rolfs C et al. 1982 Zeitschrift für Physik A: Atoms and Nuclei 305 319
[25] Uhrmacher M Pampus K Bergmeister F J et al. 1985 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 9 234
[26] Croft S 1991 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 309 353
[27] Spyrou K Chronidou C Harissopulos S Kossionides S Paradellis T Rolfs C Schulte W H Borucki L 2000 Eur. Phys. J. 7 79
[28] Couture A Beard M Couder M Görres J Lamm L LeBlanc P J Lee H Y O’Brien S Palumbo A Stech E Strandberg E Tan W Uberseder E Ugalde C Wiescher M Azuma R 2008 Phys. Rev. 77 015802
[29] Retz-Schmidt Th 1958 Z. Naturforschg. 13A 833
[30] Wilson W E Toburen L H 1975 Phys. Rev. 11 1303
[31] Criswell T L Toburen L H Rudd M E 1977 Phys. Rev. 16 508
[32] Anttila A Keinonen J Hautala M Forsblom I 1977 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 147 501
[33] Fowler W A Lauritsen C C Lauritsen T 1948 Rev. Mod. Phys. 20 236